Best Practice Action Detail

Best Practice Action 8.1

GreenStep City Best Practices: Land Use
Mixed Uses No. 8

Develop efficient land patterns that generate community health and wealth.

Best Practice Action 1

Organize or participate in a community planning/placemaking/design process for the city/a mixed-use district, including specific community engagement practices that engage cultural and income diverse community members.

  • The Minnesota Design Team charges a small fee to assemble teams of approximately 20 volunteer professionals who use design and planning approaches to help small Minnesota communities develop a shared vision of a healthy future and create great public spaces. The MDT focuses on designs and processes for making communities more complete, compact and connected.
  • The University of MN's Minnesota Design Center helped develop the 2016 Rochester Destination Medical Center District Design Guidelines and District Sustainability Standards for the Ford Site.
  • While not restricted to mixed-use districts, the Equitable Development Scorecard (Harrison Neighborhood Association & others: 2015) allows development plans/projects and policies to be developed and evaluated along 5 dimensions (community engagement, and land use, economic development, housing, and transportation practices) to ensure that everyone regardless of race, economic status, ability or the neighborhood in which they live has access to essential ingredients for environmental, economic, social, and cultural well-being including: living wage jobs, entrepreneurial opportunities, viable housing choices, public transportation, good schools, strong social networks, safe and walkable streets, services parks, and access to healthy food.
  • Inclusive Healthy Places (2019: Gehl Institute and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) is an evaluation and implementation framework to help planners/policymakers create public spaces that promote individual and community health and well-being. See also Playbook for Inclusive Placemaking (2019: Project for Public Spaces).  
  • Community benefits agreements (Alliance for Metropolitan Stability: 2008) are a tool to ensure meaningful and enforceable outcomes, especially for low-income people and communities of color, during redevelopment planning.
1 star Conduct a process that involves community members / stakeholder input; engage artists, fund the integration of arts into city plans; adopt a creative placemaking plan. Report main street revitalization and preservation under BPA 5.2; comp plan civic engagement under BPA 6.1, and community visioning and planning initiatives using a framework under BPA 24.5.
2 star Bring in a facilitator to work with the city, community members and other stakeholders; use the Equitable Development Scorecard as an evaluation tool; provide translators and interpreters, childcare, stipends, and/or meals for residents during community engagement meetings (which should be held on nights or weekends).
3 star Participate in a Minnesota Design Team charrette; plan to increase the percentage of residents who work within 10 miles of their homes.

Who's doing it

Arden Hills - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2015
Implementation details:
The City of Arden Hills went through a large-scale community planning process to develop a Master Plan for the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant site beginning in 2013. Several open houses were held, as well as monthly opportunities for residents to speak at a Public Hearing at City Council meetings. Staff, consultants and residents all worked together to develop the Master Plan for the area. The TCAAP Master Plan includes several mixed use zoning districts and the site has been designed to be very pedestrian friendly development.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Mike Mrosla (City staff) | mmrosla@cityofardenhills.org | 6517927822
Partners:
Bemidji - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
The Minnesota Design Team visited Bemidji on September 14-16 of 2012. In addition to touring the Bemidji area, they held two events to connect with the Bemidji community. On Friday evening, community members gathered with the Minnesota Design Team to help develop our shared vision of Bemidji’s future and brainstorm ideas and practices that could be implemented in Bemidji. The MDT used this feedback from community members to prepare their presentation for Saturday evening. They first presented a slideshow at the Chief Theater, before moving to a nearby location where community members could see each slide/poster prepared and converse directly with Minnesota Design Team members on their thoughts about Bemidji’s future.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Input from the Minnesota Design Team visit is currently being utilized in the creation of the Greater Bemidji Area's Comprehensive Plan.
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Casey Mai (City staff) | casey.mai@jpbgba.org | 218-759-3594
Partners: Mayana Rice and the Greater Bemidji Area Joint Planning Board
Crosslake - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2016
Implementation details:
The Minnesota Design Team (MDT) visited Crosslake September 16-17, 2016 with architects, landscape architects, urban designers, planners, and other experts in design and community development.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Out of this project, a community team called the Crosslakers was created.
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Martha Steele (Community volunteer) | steeles@brainerd.net | 218-765-4041
Partners:
Fridley - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2015
Implementation details:
Following the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's purchase of the Columbia Arena site, the City of Fridley enlisted the services of the Twin Cities Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) Corridor Development Initiative to assist with stakeholder input. LISC led a series of community workshops to identify development guidelines for the site as well as the adjacent Fridley public works building and park/soccer fields. These guidelines were the foundation of the Columbia Arena Redevelopment Master Plan and the design for the new civic campus.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File: view file
For more information contact:
Rachel Workin (City staff) | rachel.workin@fridleymn.gov | 763-572-3594
Partners: LISC
Moorhead - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
Downtown Moorhead Master Plan
In Progress: 4 phase, 12 month plan, approved by the Moorhead EDA on 4/1/2019
The purpose of the expected outcomes of the plan are:
· Broad public engagement to gain community support
· Identifying priorities and strategic opportunities to encourage appropriate development, improve underutilized space, and activate civic assets to their highest and best uses
· Identifying best practices for continued efforts to make Downtown Moorhead a more livable, walkable and thriving urban center
· Driving investment opportunities to Downtown Moorhead and maximizing on the return of public and private investments
· Integrating and synchronizing the aesthetics and amenities of both public and private investments in Downtown Moorhead
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Dan Mahli (City staff) | dan.mahli@cityofmoorhead.com | 218-299-5314
Partners:
Mounds View - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2019
Implementation details:
In 2018/2019 the City created a Comprehensive Plan task force to formulate our 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Members included council, staff, commission members, consultants, community members, and stakeholders. Additionally, A community opinion survey was distributed in the April 2018 Utility Bills, spring 2018 edition of Mounds View Matters, and on the City’s website. The survey included 15 questions on various subjects related to the Comprehensive Plan. The City received 845 responses, equivalent to 7% of the population.

Based on the community input and the Task Force – as compared to previous updates, the Mixed-Use designation becomes a more substantial category for guiding land use. The purpose of a Mixed-Use category is to remove barriers for developments that have complementary uses from two or more use categories – for instance a combination of multi-family residential and office/retail uses together on one parcel, or one neighborhood. The Future Land Use map includes two neighborhoods of Mixed Use; (1) Mounds View Blvd & Groveland Rd; and (2) Mounds View Blvd & Co Rd H2. The previous plan had one mixed use district.

It is the intent – not requirement – that development within the Mixed-Use designation be developed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The City anticipates that Mixed Use districts will be redeveloped at 60% residential and 40% commercial with the residential portions matching the density minimums and maximums of the High-Density Residential designation:
• Mixed Use (residential component): 15 to 30 units per acre.
The City of Mounds View seeks to achieve Mixed Use Districts by:
• Allowing development of multiple, complementary uses that support one another.
• Promoting a walkable, sustainable development pattern that supports alternative forms of transportation (walking, biking, and transit) while still accommodating the automobile.


Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Nyle Zikmund (City Staff) | nyle.zikmund@moundsviewmn.org | 612-860-7442
Partners:
North Branch - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
City participated and collaborated with the Minnesota Design Team in 2018. After successful completion of the MN Design Team visit in 2018, the City has continued towards implementing the ideas and strategies generated throughout the MN Design Team visit bringing residents, businesses and community together to be part of the change and development of City of North Branch
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Renae Fry (City staff) | renaef@ci.north-branch.mn.us | 651-277-5229
Partners:
Pine City - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
Pine City adopted an ordinance allowing for mixed-use zoning (shown in purple in attached map) after debate about revitalizing an area adjacent to downtown along 3rd Avenue SE. In 2009, the City participated in a Minnesota Design Team charrette and identified for mixed-use zoning possibilities and areas of in-fill development.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
2009 - Minnesota Design Team visit
2007 - Zoned property MXU (Mixed Use)
2014 - Condemned property in MXU District for future development.
Descriptive File: view file
For more information contact:
Andrew Mack, AICP (City staff) | Amack@pinecitygov.com | 320-629-2575
Partners: Private property owners, developers, and the public
Saint Peter - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2012
Implementation details:
The Community Development Department directs the economic development and planning efforts of the city. The department also supports industrial, commercial and residential development and coordinates those efforts with multiple public and private partners. Saint Peter has successfully implemented mixed use with housing where both single family and multi-family have both been developed. Currently, the city is working on a downtown commercial project with ground floor space and residential use on top.
1999 MN Design Team charrettte.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Todd Prafke (City Staff) | barbaral@saintpetermn.gov | 507-934-0663
Partners: Greater Mankato Growth, MnDOT-District 7
Willmar - 3 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
In 2005 the MN Design Team Made 2 Visits to Willmar. One was to review the city as a whole and the other was to discuss opportunities to revitalize downtown.
From those meeting the Willmar Design Center was formed.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
A Comprehensive Downtown Plan. Becker farmers market was formed. Willmar walks plans were developed.
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Sara Sietsema (City Staff) | ssietsema@willmarmn.gov | 320-235-4760
Partners: Willmar Design Center.
Eden Prairie - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
The City and New American Academy as partners hosted 4-2 hour planning, design and feasibility workshops to engage community members, business owners and other stakeholders on the future Town Center light rail station area. The workshop was facilitated by Twin Cities LISC and made possible by a Corridors of Opportunity grant from the Metropolitan Council.

http://www.corridorsofopportunity.org/Corridors_News?page=8
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Jennifer Fierce (City Staff) | jfierce@edenprairie.org | 952-949-8313
Partners: Twin Cities LISC; New American Academy; Metropolitan Council/Corridors of Opportunity
Edina - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
Grandview District community involvment:
http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=planning_GrandViewUpdate

54th Street Reconstuction and Arden Park stormwater management plan public engagement and sustainable infrastructure.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Cary Teague (City Staff) | Cteague@edinamn.gov | (952) 826-0460
Partners:
Golden Valley - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2008
Implementation details:
In 2008 a consultant was used to facilitate community planning meetings for the I-394 mixed use district for the comprehensive plan. Resident and business surveys were sent out and a visual preference survey was conducted. An open house was held to gather input on the re-zoning process as well as a “resident roundtable” to address specific concerns brought up in the surveys. A presentation on the progress of the project was given to the West Metro Chamber of Commerce and made available to other organizations and neighborhood associations.


The 2040 comprehensive plan will use some form of community planning process for additional mixed use planning. The City continues to expand outreach efforts in order to connect more residents to these processes.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Jason Zimmerman (City staff) | jzimmerman@goldenvalleymn.gov | (763)-593-8099
Partners:
Granite Falls - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2022
Implementation details:
The city is a partner in having a City Artist in Residency. We are the first smaller community in size to have a city artist. The goal of the artist is to engage community members, reach out to under representative populations (Low-income, Indigenous, People of Color and more), create social inclusion activities within the community and events. A community committee oversees the program.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Crystal Johnson (City staff) | crystal.johnson@granitefalls.com | 320-56-3011
Partners: Department of Public Transformation, Granite Falls Arts Council
Hastings - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
Heart of Hastings Neighborhood Plan – 2002; Vermillion Corridor Plan – 2006; Comprehensive Plan 2007-2008 (will review again in 2017-18)
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
John Hinzman (City staff) | jhinzman@hastingsmn.gov | 651-480-2378
Partners:
Hutchinson - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2013
Implementation details:
The City of Hutchinson and the Hutchinson Economic Development Authority
(EDA) commissioned the creation of a “Downtown Vision & Action Plan” to establish
a strategic vision for the future of Downtown Hutchinson and the Crow River District
to the north. The intent of this effort is twofold. First, to establish a unified community vision for the future of this area by gathering input from community residents
through numerous public outreach and engagement steps. The second goal is to
create a clear, concise and unified implementation strategy to achieve the desired
vision.
Context is important. While the planning area is primarily focused on the Downtown and the Crow River corridor, understanding the synergies and leveraging the
assets of the entire community (beyond just the downtown) will play a role in how
Hutchinson positions itself in the future.
The primary objectives for the Downtown Vision & Action Plan are to:
• Build and enhance Hutchinson's sense of community;
• Expand and improve the range of livability factors in the community;
• Strengthen and diversify the local economy, and;
• Enhance Hutchinson as a destination.
Key elements of the planning effort include:
• Exploration of appropriate land uses;
• Identification of redevelopment opportunities (particularly along the Crow
River);
• Identification of potential catalyst projects;
• Enhanced trail connectivity along the riverfront (Luce Line Trail) to the Downtown;
• Integration of public art with planned public improvements throughout
these areas;
• Identification of potential policy and regulatory changes as well as incentives
needed to set the stage for plan implementation;
• Identification of short, medium and long-term action steps, their associated
budgets and responsible parties, and;
• Identification of success criteria, the measurement techniques to be employed in determining progress over time.
To lead this effort, the City and the EDA hired Hoisington Koegler Group, inc., a planning, urban design and landscape architecture firm from Minneapolis, and W-ZHA,
a market research firm from Boston, MA. Both firms worked on the 2003 Downtown
Revitalization Master Plan and are familiar with the community, and intent of the
Downtown Vision & Action Plan will be to provide the next chapter to the successful
2003 planning effort.
The market research element examined the viability of downtown retail, hospitality
and nightlife, and other related uses that could strengthen the downtown for both
Hutchinson residents and tourism. The study also examined commercial and office
opportunities and provided suggestions on potential housing alternatives in the
downtown and along the Crow River.
The Downtown Vision & Action Plan is implementation focused, providing a unified
vision for the community, yet grounded in reality for achievable results for the City
of Hutchinson over the next 10 to 20 years.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File: view file
For more information contact:
John Paulson (City staff) | jpaulson@ci.hutchinson.mn.us | 320-234-5682
Partners:
Inver Grove Heights - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2012
Implementation details:
The historic Concord Boulevard Neighborhood in Inver Grove Heights has experienced significant public investments in recent years. The City of Inver Grove Heights now hopes to use these improvements and amenities to encourage new residential and commercial development to improve the existing residential neighborhood, strengthen and increase commercial activities, increase property values, and provide additional employment opportunities. To initiate this private investment, the City has completed the Concord Boulevard Neighborhood Plan. Many groups such as elected and appointed officials, business owners and managers, neighborhood and community at large, city staff, Dakota CDA, Progress Plus, and South St. Paul were consulted in developing this plan during two stakeholder meetings. During these meetings, stakeholders presented their future vision of the corridor and provided input on a preferred plan.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Ally Sutherland (City Staff) | asutherland@invergroveheights.org | 651-604-8511
Partners:
Mankato - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
The Sibley Parkway redevelopment project took a former blighted concrete plant site and has since transformed it to an active riverfront development area. At the inception of the project, neighborhood input was solicited for the visioning of the process to help guide the plans to ensure compatibility with the neighborhood. Additionally, per City Council approvals, all proposals in the redevelopment area are required to go through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process to ensure public notice and encourage resident participation and review of all proposals.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
In 2012 a 60-unit apartment building was the first development in the redevelopment area, and resident input encouraged the developer to lower the height by one story to ensure viewshed of the river and adjacent areas was maintained. In 2013 a series of townhomes were constructed to the south. City staff is working to encourage investment of mixed-use commercial elements in proposals for the area.
Descriptive File: view file
For more information contact:
Molly Westman (City staff) | mwestman@mankatomn.gov | 507-387-8571
Partners:
New Brighton - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
(1) The City of New Brighton has organized and participated in various community planning and design processes that have yielded desires for mixed use ordinances and developments, most notable the New Brighton Exchange redevelopment area. These studies are known as the Old Highway 8 Corridor Study and a Vision for the Heart of New Brighton. New Brighton’s Planning Commission reviews all community planning items and provides recommendations to the City Council.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Craig Schlichting (City staff) | craig.schlichting@newbrightonmn.gov | 651-638-2056
Partners:
New Hope - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
The city adopted its "City Center Vision" in June of 2011, which promotes mixed-use development. As stated in the vision, "the higher density housing options in City Center will include new housing types for the community, such as higher-end condominiums and rental units, and mixed-use residential/commercial buildings. Housing, commercial and office uses and multi-modal transportation options will support each other and be part of the new identity of City Center." The City Council and Planning Commission led the development of the vision, supported by staff, consultants, and contributors from the public and private sector. The City Center Vision was presented to local businesses and residents at several meetings. Additionally, the city secured a Livable Communities grant in 2001-2002, which examined redevelopment opportunities in the Bass Lake Rd & Winnetka Ave area. The focus was on redevelopment of underutilized or marginal properties within the city. The task force included approximately 60 members of the community including citizens, business owners, city commission members, and school district representatives.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Jeff Alger (City Staff) | jalger@newhopemn.gov | 763-531-5119
Partners:
Oakdale - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2018
Implementation details:
The City has recently completed two community planning processes: for the Gold Line BRT Helmo Station, and the former 3M Foundation Property. The Helmo Station process evaluated development potential for a 1/2 mile radius around the planned Bus Rapid Transit station within Oakdale. The study area currently is both vacant and occupied commercial land, the approved change in zoning to a PUD includeds high and medium density residential, professional office, flex office, retail and park and open space. A consultant was used to facilitate the station area planning process and community open houses, online community engagement, and direct meetings with affected property owners.

Similarly, a consultant was used to facilitate the public planning process for the former 3M Foundation Property, property that was previously zoned for a business park. A small area study was completed and it was determined a new residential neighborhood was the best use for the land. Though a series of public open houses with the adjacent neighborhood a preferred conceptual master plan has been developed and approved by the City Council.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Jen Hassebroek (City staff) | jen.hassebroek@ci.oakdale.mn.us | 651-730-2723
Partners: Stantec
Richfield - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
During the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, 52 people attended a meeting on 2/15/07 and completed survey forms designed to learn about the meeting participants and their views on several community development issues. Over a two month period, four community meetings were held to seek public input on ideas and concepts that were assembled based on initial community input. The concepts were intended to allow a testing of some of the “big ideas” being considered as part of the plan. As matter of policy, the City organizes stakeholder groups for all area plans and master plans.

The City hired private consultants for the development of the Comp Plan and for master plans like the Bicycle Master Plan. These consultants also helped facilitate the stakeholder-involvement processes.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Melissa Poehlman (City staff) | MPoehlman@richfieldmn.gov | 6128619766
Partners:
Saint Louis Park - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
City implemented a recent set of meetings directed to a mixed use area that will be on the SW LRT Line. A stormwater study is also a part of this action.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Design guidlelines developed for this area, including zoning changes, stormwater BMP placement, master traffic plan and green space/park options.
Descriptive File: view file
For more information contact:
Meg McMonigal (City staff) | mmcmonigal@stlouispark.org | 952-924-2573
Partners: SRF Consulting, HKGi Consulting
Silver Bay - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
Silver Bay has created a 100 acre eco-park that incorporates many economic development clusters such as energy facilities, sustainable food facilities, education, office space, retail, and tourism. Their goal for the eco-park is to network businesses to work with each other and the Silver Bay Community in order to create and diversify living wage employment by improving re- source productivity, eliminating pollution and expanding markets through renewable, sustainable energy development.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Lana Fralich (City staff) | lanaf@silverbay.com | 218-226-4408
Partners:
Victoria - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
The City of Victoria participated in a Downtown Master Planning process in 2008. The process brought in a consulting firm to orchestrate the planning process with the community stakeholders.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Madison Fox-Christensen (City staff) | mfoxchristensen@ci.victoria.mn.us | 952-443-4219
Partners:
West Saint Paul - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2001
Implementation details:
The City adopted The Robert St Renaissance Plan in 2001. The process to develop this plan included community members as part of the stakeholder group. It also included numerous meetings to gather public input. The whole process was facilitated by multiple consultants.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Dave Schletty (City Staff) | DSchletty@wspmn.gov | 651-552-4152
Partners:
Woodbury - 2 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
In 2010, the City began an extensive study to develop alternatives for a proposed mixed-use development area. The resulting document, the Urban Village Master Plan, was completed in February 2012. The process for developing the Master Plan allowed for a multitude of opportunity for public input; through open houses for the community, stakeholder meetings, Planning Commission meetings, and City Council meetings. The process was aided by the consultant HKGI, which has a strong background of planning for mixed-use development.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Mark Huonder (City staff) | mhuonder@ci.woodbury.mn.us | 651-714-3535
Partners:
Austin - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
Implimented in 2004, developed design standards for program- Austin Main Street Program.
Working now in Vision 2020 to make Main Street a destinatnion place (have businesses and residential rental space on second floor).
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Janet Anderson (Community volunteer) | janetanderson2840@gmail.com | 5072190680
Partners: Craig Hoium; DCA
Brooklyn Center - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2018
Implementation details:
For the past couple of years the City of Brooklyn Center has be working on the Opportunity Site in Brooklyn Center. A 80 plus aces of City owner property create a new development in the heart of Brooklyn Center. The City has conducted public engagement thru the course of the project along with working with a multitude of partners to continue to refine the Master Plan.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Andrew Hogg (City staff) | ahogg@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us | 763-569-3327
Partners:
Coon Rapids - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
Coon Rapids is currently working on a mixed use area near Foley Blvd with plans for a park and ride location, Northern Lights Express rail, bus service and road improvements. The plans also include commercial and residential redevelopment in collaboration with property owners. Connectivity improvements are also recommended for motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists. The City is working with Anoka County, MnDOt and Metro Transit. The planning project is funded by a $40,000 grant from the Metropolitan Council. The goal of the grant program is to catalyze development around transit stations. This process is managed by the City's Community Development Specialist.
A website was created to share up to date information with the community and allow for feedback from residents.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Colleen Sinclair (City staff) | csinclair@coonrapidsmn.gov | 763-767-6485
Partners:
Duluth - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2010
Implementation details:
Many of the planning and design processes conducted by Duluth's Planning department involve public input, including for some mixed use districts.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Adam Fulton (City staff) | afulton@hermantownmn.com | 218-729-3618
Partners:
Eagan - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
This project is complete and ongoing.

The Cedar Grove Redevelopment was approved on basis of the Cedar/13 Study, which involved a facilitated analysis of the project area and future development scenarios. This analysis included community and stakeholder input. The Opportunity City Program Study Report will also provide design professional input relative to the City's three mixed use special areas.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File: view file
For more information contact:
Jenna Olsen (City Staff) | jolsen@cityofeagan.com | 651/675-5330
Partners:
Gilbert - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
A facilitator is someone who helps a group of people understand their common objectives and assists them to plan how to achieve these objectives. I would assume this to be apparent during waste water discussions. Multiple Waste water treatment facility meetings were held with many experts on the situation. Also there were members from Stance present. Tiffany Edholm sat in on a meeting and observed Stantec's presence. The two men were very knowledgable and stayed fairly unbiased. Meeting members discussed different options to remedy said problem
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
The idea of a facilitator is great for meetings that are high stake, with people who have passionate opinions. A third party can keep a level head and see pro's and con's to every side.
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Sam Lautigar (City staff) | samlautigar@gilbertmn.org | 218-748-2214
Partners:
Jordan - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
A community planning/design process has been held for the downtown (C-2 district). The requirement for public hearings is laid out in the comprehensive plan's implementation section VII.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Nathan Fuerst (City staff) | nfuerst@jordanmn.gov | 952-492-7929
Partners:
Lake Elmo - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2013
Implementation details:
The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the Old Village Center for mixed-use zoning (VMX) to encourage a variety of uses that will provide opportunities for commerce, retail, entertainment, community spaces and housing, all working in synergy to drive activity, energy, and people to downtown Lake Elmo. In 2013, the VMX zoning district was created with the intent to facilitate development that is consistent with a compact, walkable environment that builds upon the historical land use patterns of the Village. It has also been designed to allow a wide range of uses and activities and encourages the mixing of different use types. The ordinance includes standards for specific development types with provisions that address the unique character of the Village.
In general, the standards allow a much higher degree of flexibility for building and activity in the Village than was previously permitted.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Number of parcels rezoned to VMX: 3 since 2013
Number of new uses allowed in Village District as a result of new zoning.
Number of mixed use housing units erected.
Density increase.
Descriptive File: view file
For more information contact:
Sophia Jensen (City Staff) | sjensen@lakeelmo.org | 651-747-3900
Partners:
New Prague - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2010
Implementation details:
In 2010, City staff and citizens participated in a walkable community workshop. During this workshop, staff and citizens were able to envision ideas for making their community more walkable. With our upcoming Comprehensive Plan re-write, these types of workshops will be used throughout 2023 to assist in bring community planning ideas to citizens, elected officials, and staff.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Joshua Tetzlaff (City Staff) | jtetzlaff@ci.new-prague.mn.us | 952.758.4401
Partners:
Red Wing - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
The Downtown Main Street action plan was adopted in 2009 and accepted in 2010. Red Wing was one of the first 5 cities in the state to do so.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Paul Drotos (City staff) | paul.drotos@ci.red-wing.mn.us | 651-410-6744
Partners:
Robbinsdale - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2012
Implementation details:
Planning for the METRO Blue Line Extension has actively involved community members and stakeholder input. Public open houses are hosted by the project office and held in various locations throughout Robbinsdale. Together, the City and the project office work together to conduct outreach, communications, and engagement about the project. The Robbinsdale City Council has also hosted public meetings to discuss the project.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Kayla Kirtz (City Staff) | kkirtz@ci.robbinsdale.mn.us | 763-233-5654
Partners: Metropolitan Council; Metro Transit; City of Minneapolis; City of Crystal; City of Brooklyn Park
Rosemount - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
In 2004, the City prepared the Development Framework for Downtown Rosemount. This process included a series of public meetings and design charrettes to create and maintain Downtown Rosemount in a manner consistent with the community vision.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
The Development Framework for Downtown Rosemount has served as the guiding document for several redevelopment projects in downtown including Waterford Commons, a mixed use residential and commercial building, the Steeple Center and the Dakota County Public Library.
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Julia Hogan (City Staff) | julia.hogan@ci.rosemount.mn.us | 651-322-2052
Partners:
Saint Anthony - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
The City of St. Anthony has completed the following main street programs:
1. In 2000, the City adopted a standard for the design and construction of road and streets that incorporated sidewalks and pedestrain level lighting to encourage walkability.
2. The City developed guidelines steering the construction and redevelopment of the Apache Plaza Mall area that incorporated a main street pedestrian friendly environment.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Jay Hartman (City staff) | jay.hartman@ci.saint-anthony.mn.us | 612-782-3314
Partners:
Stillwater - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed: 2018
Implementation details:
The City of Stillwater and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee participated in a community planning process, which presented the future land use for a mixed use highway district along Hwy 36. The planning process included public input as well as input from various interest groups.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
Descriptive File: view file
For more information contact:
Bill Turnblad (City staff) | bturnblad@ci.stillwater.mn.us | 651-430-8821
Partners:
White Bear Lake - 1 star
Date action report first entered:
Date of last report update:
Year action initially completed:
Implementation details:
The City established a Special Service District in downtown White Bear Lake in 1992. A portion of the Special Service District funds are allocated to a program for property owners within the district, called Downtown White Bear Lake. Downtown White Bear Lake is a non-profit organization formed to serve the promotion and development needs of this special service district, aimed at revitalizing the community’s commercial core. Membership is voluntary and its members are committed to promotional efforts and special event coordination. The organization also strives to improve the quality and diversity of business by encouraging a wide variety of economic, cultural and recreational opportunities. Downtown White Bear Lake seeks to generate excitement and activity while building a strong business image through a combined effort from businesses, services and community residents now and in the future.
The City promotes Downtown White Bear Lake by providing a link on the official city website, and also participates in a 50/50 cost share to fund a promotional banner program in the downtown area.
Outcome measures/metrics/money saved:
A link to Downtown White Bear Lake can be found on the city's official website, under the Community Links section.

A link to the official City ordinance that established the Special Service district can be found on the City's official website, in the Municipal Code, within Article V.
Descriptive File:
For more information contact:
Connie Taillon (City staff) | ctaillon@whitebearlake.org | 651-429-8564
Partners: Downtown White Bear Lake organization